Professional Business Communications for Logic- myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about theProfessional Business Communications for Logic. Answer: In chapter 15: Critical Thinking, Argument, Logic, and Persuasion, the author describes the close connection between these three concepts. He concludes that critical thinking is all about presenting arguments in a logical, clear and persuasive manner especially when responding to questions and problems (Chapter 15: Critical Thinking, Argument, Logic, And Persuasion ). In the newspaper section the Australian For The Informed Australian, Budget Sweeteners Leave Slightly Sour Aftertaste, the writer is expressing the views of the majority in regard to the new budget. According to him, this budget has led a condition with harsh prevailing economic variables such as increasing public debt, uncertain terms of trade, and aging population. On the other hand, the author of the material Breakfast of Champions? 16th May 2017, summarizes the general outlooks of various individuals about the changes in the higher education in Sydney, Australia (The Australian, 2017). I tend to agree with the author's point of view when he asserts that questioning and critical thinking enable an individual to examine and put into a test any sort of propositions which are provided for acceptance, in an attempt to figure out whether the reasons, inferences, and conclusions equal the arguer's argument. Apparently, the writer of the newspaper article takes this stand. Throughout his work, he reinforces his standpoints with robust premises. For example, to provide a clear prove that the new budget has come along with economic drawbacks he points out that circumstances such as widening gap between the poor and the rich, increasing national debt, augmented dependency ratio, only to mention a few, have substantially lowered the overall living standards of the citizens(Budget Sweeteners leave Slightly Sour Aftertaste ). His information covers opinions of the majority, facts and it is free of propaganda. Facts, in this case, can easily be verified and opinion; though are ba sed on realistic information are evolving from the writer's interpretation of facts. Besides, the information in this section appears to be well-researched and hence valid. In addition, assumptions made in this material are reasonable and free of errors and omissions. According to him, the government parties are known to put their interests before those of nation, thus making decisions ahead of the views of the voters and implementing decisions as demanded by circumstances. In short, the arguments explained by this writer are in line with other related works I have read before on the same topic. In the Breakfast of Champions, however, the writer seems to be deprived of a clear sense of cognitive reasoning. First, the flow of argument in the material is quite intricate, multifaceted and hence difficult to conceptualize and comprehend his message. This aspect is contradicting the first authors opinion that critical thinking is often manifested in writing materials which present aptitude of persuasion which is often depicted the arguers ability to develop a precise understanding of the content as well as evaluating it. Unlike the other two writers, his work is not organized logically and as such points are not clearly presented. One, therefore, finds the text complicated to read and comprehend. Bibliography THE AUSTRALIAN. (2017, May 17). Breakfast of Champions, p. 1. Budget Sweeteners leave Slightly Sour Aftertaste. (n.d.). The Australian for the Informed Australian. (n.d.). CHAPTER 15: CRITICAL THINKING, ARGUMENT, LOGIC, AND PERSUASION.