Addressing the Ill Effects of the Five Paragraph Theme

A scholarly person has an Idea a great, huge, marvellous Idea. She wants to sp are about It, so she turns to the only government agency she knows how to write. The Five split up Theme. In whole of her years of school, she has been led to hope that it is the only profound way to write an essay. In the process of makeup her essay and forcing all of her ideas into triple main topics, she loses a great deal of the important information she had previously planned to write about.But thats okay, she thinks, be attain at least her writing is rise up organized and written in an acceptcapable way, proper(ip)? Wrong tout ensemble their lives, students rich person been manipulated into believing that five carve ups in an essay is the only way to go. In reality how forever, according to Mrs.. Kimberly Wesley, an English teacher at Berkeley preparative School, Tampa, Florida, becoming complacent with only being able to write In one format stunts the growth of human minds (57). The FTP was meant to assistant students with their writing and organizational skills after they mastered the art of writing In Itself.Instead, whats been incident Is that teachers eve become satisfied with staying on the edge of the status quo, and have fallen back on using the simply structured content phenomenon FTP as their main teaching method to teach their students how to write efficiently. To create an easy grading system and keep organized fix in the class so students think they know what theyre doing, they have obligate the persuasion on the children that the FTP is the only way they will ever, and should ever write essays.I myself remember on separate occasions in young high when I would receive less than satisfactory grades mainly ca accustom I didnt stick expressly to the FTP. With time, I conformed to the idea, as all of my classmates with me and forward me had. Now, In high school, learning that Its not the only way to write, and that its real desired to write In a contrary format, comes as a dispute as well as a relief to me.Along with so many others, I had unwittingly fallen prey to the complacence that came with the belief that I had learned all that my teachers wanted from me, and that besides more obscure topics, not much more would ever be expected of me. ever-changing the way Ive been rating for years will not be impossible, but it will be an uphill road. If a teacher does not challenge a student, they will not ever reach their full possible.When students believe they must stay strictly within their guidelines for their essays, they carry seeds of critical fancy that are never allowed to grow, says Wesley (58). Instead they focus mainly on all the way summarizing the effects of whatever they were sent to write about, and not revealing much, or any opinion of their own, as it didnt fit within the neat positivist formula of their thesis (58). As a result, many essays that ad the potential for great Insight were cut and pruned un til only the most basic bones remained.In other words, Instead of using It to create an Interesting, more thought provoking essay, students channel all of their energy Into keeping wealth the confines of three neatly connected ideas. Rather than endlessly revolving in this dry, staring them right in the face. They dont need to stick to five paragraphs. Especially when they have topics that are extremely complicated and must fit into, for example 6 to septette pages. The thought of using only three ideas and five paragraphs to write six to seven page paper seems absolutely ridiculous when one unfeignedly ponders the notion.What Wesley introduces is that while there must be an introduction, body, and conclusion, there is no mickle rule that says there must only be one paragraph for each the introduction and conclusion, and only three paragraphs that explain three ideas. As long as you have a clear introduction, body, and conclusion, you can use as many paragraphs and ideas as yo u like Wesley calls this the Rhetorical Process. A dependent relationship is when two organisms share or feed after another(prenominal) in order to main. Take for example, the relationship between feeder prawn and sharks.Feeder shrimp eat the organisms and plants that get caught in sharks gills. By them doing so, the shark is able to breathe efficiently, and the shrimp get nutrients that allow them to live and grow. The student and teacher have a similar symbiotic relationship. When the student works harder for the teacher, the teacher works harder for the student, and in doing so, they are both able to grow. The student responds to a teachers encouragement, and in return, the teacher responds to a students enthusiasm.When that occurs, the student grows as an independent writer, and the teacher is allowed to accomplish their Job more fully. When teachers go beyond the minimum emergency and revoke the easy, cookie cutter way of teaching that turns out cookie cutter students to p ass on to the next grade, but instead design on students strengths, work on strengthening their weaknesses, and teach each student according to their individual potential, they remove the boundaries on the students learning, and set them free.One way of proposing this alteration in organizing ideas is o show students different styles of writing, from different time periods and from stack of all ages and backgrounds, to show them that there really are many different ways to write. Wesley believes that when students are asked to reflect on what format best enables them to verbalise their concerns and meets the needs of their audience (60), they are encouraged to become communicators, which will help them immensely out in the real world. Coming from a students luff of view, I agree wholeheartedly.