Should Downloading Music Be Illegal.

Response to text- Why You Should Pay For Music by John Sheldrick Dear John, I read your article and I hire some comments about it I would like to ack straightawayledge about it foremost when you mention that you advocate a culture in which pot very want to spend funds on practice of medicine, but I in truth think we should advocate a culture where everybody listens to music and not expert the ones who realise a computer and and a bank account, I rely that music should be a right and not a privilege and everybody should want to testamentingly listen to music. because you argue that people value music but they dont value it in the sense that they will willingly fork over $1 for a song, I hold back more than 2 m songs in my program library, that is equal to 2 thousand dollars and I really dont have that extra money to spend and people usually dont like to spend their money on things they lavatory accept for free. I would much rather use that money to buy something else a nd if we had to have for every single song we would like to listen to our music library would be much smaller and we could not enjoy music as much as we enjoy it when we have a large mixing of it.For the consumer, music is not a product or a service. They give in for physical copies of music such as CDs, they pay for music sheets or for subscriptions to music services, but they dont pay for a song by itself. afterwards that you state that artisans now have no money to keep transcription music and have to go on tours to string the money. I do agree that some workman that argon not yet ascertained should get support from their fans so they could keep evidenceing music, but atomic number 18nt players vatical to be doing music because its their impatience?They be not supposed to go into the business because they want money and fame even though I dont render the artist at the top of the charts starving to death. Music is about passion and the ones who are recording music are supposed to want to put up their music to all kinds of people so they can enjoy it and the musician is supposed to be satisfied with that and not be crushed because they are not the cover of a magazine. I also think that tours are a great thing, why listen to a record when you can go out and the real human behind the voice endure and enjoy it more closely.Its clear that everybody thinks music should be free, because its going to dole out everywhere else. Why should the music industry care whether the money comes from a tour with $100 in profits or the exact aforesaid(prenominal) amount is brought in from CD purchases? In the end, it doesnt matter, money is still culmination in and can be used to record more music. Then you talk about how music labels are closing because the lack of money they are getting but I actually think that record labels are trying to turn music into gold, music recording labels are getting a large cut of the artists money and are overcharging.The artist who are not yet discovered cant record a good album because the labels are asking for absurd quantities of money which the artist cant pay, so the label closes and the vicious circle starts again elsewhere. I think labels should spend more time developing the artists because they would have a stake in them that extended beyond their recorded music. There is no possible way anyone could seriously work in music and be looking for money and a the same time state that they actually care about the musicians.In conclusion I think that we do take on to support our artists, but that could be done a million ways other than paying an overpriced dollar for a song. With the internet now how can we be surprised when people now expect to get their music online for free? The internet file sharing and the advantages we now have in technology I see no way to crystalize the clock turned back and force people to start paying again. So the business has to get creative and evolve away from the ba rgain of recorded music and start receiving money in other ways.